On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > I think Mozilla would be fine with taking the permission API as a > dependency and implement that at the same time. Implementing the > permission API should be fairly trivial for us. > > But we should verify this with the people actually working on the push API. > >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Michael van Ouwerkerk >> <mvanouwerk...@google.com> wrote: >>> Yes, we wanted to ensure this is in the Push API because that seems to >>> have more implementation momentum from browser vendors than the Permissions >>> API. We didn't want developers to do hacky things in the meantime. I agree >>> that once the Permissions API has critical mass, that should be the single >>> place for checking permissions.
Martin, Doug? -- https://annevankesteren.nl/