On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:48 PM, Justin Fagnani <justinfagn...@google.com> wrote: > And I'm still concerned that removing is= would severely harm the cases > where you need access to special parsing behavior like <template> and > <style>.
With synchronous constructors you could imagine setting the parsing policy in the constructor (as `this[Element.parsingPolicy] = x` or some such). I wouldn't want to do that for v1, but it opens up that possibility of making the HTML parser hackable. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
