From: Bruce Lawson [mailto:bru...@opera.com] Sent: 15 June 2015 09:46
On 14 June 2015 at 01:41, Patrick H. Lauke <re...@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > it makes more sense to work on stylability of standard elements. I'd like to keep the is="" construct (or better name) in the knowledge that it's a stopgap for v1, and put our energies we're currently expending debating this into styling standard elements - which is currently being considered http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-forms/ Will leaving is= (or whatever we call it) in situ create backward compatibility problems later on if/when it changes? That aside, concentrating efforts on styling native HTML elements makes a lot of sense. Léonie -- Léonie Watson - Senior accessibility engineer @LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup PacielloGroup.com
