On 09/15/2015 03:26 PM, Daniel Veditz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com
<mailto:jackalm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
there's nothing wrong with reffing WHATWG specs. It will not delay
or hamper
publication or Rec-track advancement, despite the
occasional misinformed
complaint from someone not aware of the
policies.
When the complaint comes from the office of the Director we have to
assume it's going to hamper us whether or not they are misinformed.
To be clear here: the point made was that the Web Application Security
group never asked for a review from the Web Applications working group
prior to asking for transition to CR. As a consequence, the WebApps
group did not get an opportunity to review the Upgrade Insecure
Resources specification [1], including the reference related to Web Workers.
As a reminder, there is an expectation that the specification has
received wide review prior to the publication of a Candidate Recommendation.
Philippe
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/upgrade-insecure-requests/