> Nick, while we're waiting for Léonie to lecture you on participation-criteria, etiquette, and social competence [...]
That was actually my very first message on any of these mailing lists, so it was manually approved by a moderator. I'm very confused about how you think I broke etiquette and you did not? This whole thread could be the poster child of how not to engage with other people. Thanks, Nick Dugger On Fri, Mar 18, 2016, 4:48 AM Patrick H. Lauke <re...@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > On 18/03/2016 03:52, Richard Maher wrote: > > I've found someone who has more credibility and form here and is willing > > to take the idea forward. > > Let's hope that someone also understands what it means to make a > technical argument, without resorting to some House of Commons Tory > Obxbridge debating style with thinly veiled ad-hominems. > > https://twitter.com/JoeSondow/status/692170578023862273 > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke > http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com > twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke > >
