Can the bylaws on the website please be updated?  I think the current posted 
ones are a ballot or two behind.

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Dean Coclin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> You’re talking about BR changes. I’m just looking at Bylaw changes for this 
> ballot.
>  
> From: Doug Beattie [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 1:46 PM
> To: Stephen Davidson <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>; Dean Coclin <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>; CABFPub <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: RE: Pre-ballot on membership requirement update
>  
> I previously pointed out that “The Age of Certificate Data” section was 
> “inadvertently” moved to be under  “3.3.1 Identification and Authentication 
> for Routine Re-key” when we reformatted the document.  This seems inaccurate.
> 
> Ryan recommended moving it to section 4.2.1, between the paragraphs 
> "Applicant information MUST" and "The CA SHALL develop", which looks to be 
> the right place.  I doubt this would be controversial and is just the 
> movement of one paragraph from one section to another.  Maybe you can 
> consider this change in the next clean-up ballot?
>  
> Doug
>  
>  <> 
> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On 
> Behalf Of Stephen Davidson
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 11:42 AM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Dean Coclin 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; CABFPub 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Pre-ballot on membership requirement update
>  
> The wildcard clarification is one; and I don’t think it’s controversial.
>  
>  
> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On 
> Behalf Of [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 12:38 PM
> To: Dean Coclin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; 
> CABFPub <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Pre-ballot on membership requirement update
>  
> Dean, Trend Micro will endorse.  But can we combine with some of the other 
> non-controversial BR changes that have been circulating (I can’t remember 
> what they are) in a “miscellaneous” ballot?
>  
> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On 
> Behalf Of Dean Coclin
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 8:29 AM
> To: CABFPub
> Subject: [cabfpub] Pre-ballot on membership requirement update
>  
> I am looking for 2 endorsers for the following:
>  
> Background:
> Section 2.1 (a)(1) says that Issuing CAs “actively issue certificates to Web 
> servers…”
>  
> Section 2.1(b) of the bylaws lists the items needed in a membership 
> application by CAs. 
> But that section does not ask the CA applicant to provide a 3rd party website 
> where the CA/B Forum can validate that they are actively issuing certs to web 
> servers.  We do however ask the applicant this question, after they have 
> submitted their application. It would be helpful to have this in the bylaws 
> so we don’t have to go back and ask every time.
>  
> Specific change:
>  
> Add under 2.1(b) 
> (7) The URL of at least one third party website that is using a certificate 
> from the applicant’s CA which can be examined by Forum members
>  
> Thanks,
> Dean
>  
>  
> TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
> The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential 
> and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. 
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or 
> disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
> telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public 
> <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to