HARICA still endorses this ballot. Dimitris.
-- Sent from my mobile device. Pls excuse brevity and typos > On 26 Απρ 2016, at 06:34, Peter Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear all, > > Below is a revised ballot based on ballot 167 which failed to get quorum. I > was unable to get consensus on language around the new RFC reference text the > previous ballot had in section 7, so it has been removed. > > As a reminder, the intention here is that all SSL certificates that were > allowed under the BRs are still allowed. This is a set of corrections and > normative reference updates (such as moving OCSP to RFC 6960 to affirmatively > allow SHA-2 family signatures on responses). I think that all the > contentious material has been removed and is being held for future ballots, > so I hope that this will move forward. > > Do I have at least two endorsers? > > Thanks, > Peter > > > Ballot 168: Baseline Requirements Corrections (Revised) > > The following motion has been proposed by Peter Bowen of Amazon and endorsed > by ___________________: > > Background: > A number of small corrections and clarifications to the Baseline Requirements > have been identified. These are, in general, changes that reflect the > existing understanding of the Baseline Requirements by the Forum. Due to the > understanding that these primarily represent existing practice, they are > combined for efficiency. > > -- MOTION BEGINS -- > Effective the date of passage, the following modifications to the Baseline > Requirements are adopted: > In Section 1.6.1: > - In the definition of "Applicant Representative", replace "and agrees to the > Certificate Terms of Use" with "the Terms of Use" and append "or is the CA" > at the end of the definition; > - In the definition of "Country", replace "sovereign nation" with "Sovereign > State"; > - In the definition of "Terms of Use", append "or is the CA" at the end of > the definition; > In Section 1.6.3: > - Delete RFC2560; > - Insert "RFC6960, Request for Comments: 6960, X.509 Internet Public Key > Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSP. Santesson, Myers, > Ankney, Malpani, Galperin, Adams, June 2013."; > - Delete X.509v3; > - Insert "X.509, Recommendation ITU-T X.509 (10/2012) | ISO/IEC 9594-8:2014 > (E), Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – The Directory: > Public-key and attribute certificate frameworks." > Move the content in section 3.3.1 to section 4.2.1 to become the third > paragraph in 4.2.1 and leave section 3.3.1 blank. > In section 4.9.9, replace all occurrences of "RFC2560" with "RFC6960". > In section 5.2.2, insert "CA" immediately before "Private Key". > In section 6.1.2, append "without authorization by the Subscriber" to the end > of the first sentence. > In section 6.1.6, update the last citation to read: "[Source: Sections > 5.6.2.3.2 and 5.6.2.3.3, respectively, of NIST SP 56A: Revision 2]" > In section 6.2, in the second sentence, insert "CA" immediately before both > instances of "Private Key". > In section 6.2.5, append "without authorization by the Subordinate CA" to the > end of the sentence. > In sections 7.1.2.1(e) and 7.1.2.2(h) change the organizationName line to > read: > "- organizationName (OID 2.5.4.10): This field MUST be present and the > contents MUST contain either the Subject CA’s name or DBA as verified under > Section 3.2.2.2. The CA may include information in this field that differs > slightly from the verified name, such as common variations or abbreviations, > provided that the CA documents the difference and any abbreviations used are > locally accepted abbreviations; e.g., if the official record shows “Company > Name Incorporated”, the CA MAY use “Company Name Inc.” or “Company Name”.” > In section 7.1.2.3(d), replace the text with “The cA field MUST NOT be true." > Replace "Subordiate" with "Subordinate" in the title of 7.1.6.3. > In section 9.6.1 item 6: > - Insert "are the same entity or" immediately prior to "are Affiliated"; > - Remove "and accepted". > In section 9.6.3, replace "agreement to the Terms of Use agreement." with > "acknowledgement of the Terms of Use." > In section 9.6.3 item 2, replace "maintain sole control" with "assure > control". > In the following sections, replace all occurrences of "Subscriber or Terms of > Use Agreement" with "Subscriber Agreement or Terms of Use". > - Section 1.6.1, in the definition of "Subscriber" > - Section 4.1.2 > - Section 4.9.1.1 > - Section 4.9.11 > - Section 9.6.1 > - Section 9.6.3 > -- MOTION ENDS — > > The review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on __ April > 2016, and will close at 2200 UTC on __ May 2016. Unless the motion is > withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately > thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on __ May 2016. Votes must be cast by > posting an on-list reply to this thread. > > A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A > vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain > must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not > be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting > member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members > are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/ > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
