On 10/11/16 17:42, Jeremy Rowley wrote: > I think this is an important ballot to get right on the IP issue > considering it'll be mandatory for all CAs and there is a clear > author of the RFC. If this passes, I'd like an implementation date > that is far enough out we can effectively hold a PAG to consider any > IP disclosures made.
Surely this depends on what process we end up using? :-) If there's a PAG, clearly we need to take that delay into account, and if the PAG recommends a change, we may end up starting the process again. My point was merely that six months sounds like a good amount of time between agreeing to do it and enforcing it. Maybe I shouldn't have brough the subject up until the process is clear! ;-) Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
