Ben and Dimitris - is this something the Policy Working Group wants to address 
in its proposal relating to the uses of the term CA?

-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dean Coclin via 
Public
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 7:37 AM
To: realsky(CHT) <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List 
<[email protected]>
Cc: Dean Coclin <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] An inconsistency for "Issuing CA" in BYLAWS and SSL BR

I don’t believe these need to be consistent as they serve 2 different purposes. 
One is for membership while the other is a technical reference.

-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of realsky(CHT) via 
Public
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 9:22 AM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]>
Cc: realsky(CHT) <[email protected]>
Subject: [cabfpub] An inconsistency for "Issuing CA" in BYLAWS and SSL BR

For survey Ballot 183, I found there is an inconsistency for "Issuing CA" in 
BYLAWS of The CA/Browser  Forum version 1.4 and SSL BR V1.4.2.
 
In BYLAWS of The CA/Browser  Forum version 1.4, 

2.1 Qualifying for Forum Membership
(a) CA/Browser Forum members shall meet at least one of the following criteria.
(1) Issuing CA: The member organization operates a certification authority that 
has a current and successful WebTrust for CAs audit, or ETSI 102042 or ETSI 
101456 audit report prepared by a properly-qualified auditor, and that actively 
issues certificates to Web servers that are openly accessible from the Internet 
using a browser created by a Browser member. Applicants that are not actively 
issuing certificates but otherwise meet membership criteria may be granted 
Associate Member status under Bylaw Sec. 3.1 for a period of time to be 
designated by the Forum.


(2) Root CA: The member organization operates a certification authority that 
has a current and successful WebTrust for CAs, or ETSI 102042 or ETSI 101456 
audit report prepared by a properly-qualified auditor, and that actively issues 
certificates to subordinate CAs that, in turn, actively issue certificates to 
Web servers that are openly accessible from the Internet using a browser 
created by a Browser member.
Applicants that are not actively issuing certificates but otherwise meet 
membership criteria may be granted Associate Member status under Bylaw Sec. 3.1 
for a period of time to be designated by the Forum.


But in 1.6.1 Definitions of SSL Baseline Requirement Version 1.4.2,

Issuing CA: In relation to a particular Certificate, the CA that issued the 
Certificate. This could be either a Root CA or a Subordinate CA. 


   


Sincerely Yours,


         Li-Chun Chen
         Chunghwa Telecom Co. Ltd.

本信件可能包含中華電信股份有限公司機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿蒐集、處理或利用本信件內容,並請銷毀此信件. 
如為指定收件者,應確實保護郵件中本公司之營業機密及個人資料,不得任意傳佈或揭露,並應自行確認本郵件之附檔與超連結之安全性,以共同善盡資訊安全與個資保護責任.
Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains 
confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your 
system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and 
all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the 
improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email 
nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the 
intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information 
contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or 
distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also, 
please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to 
ensure the information security and to protect personal information.


_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://clicktime.symantec.com/a/1/2ap85654Mc5bTRpYvVifWO4iY5lFGWJEKTwH1qfxm04=?d=WN3sS69LcXVlwVQ5JMYf6YATNyIGZ1UhWdJz3hCELlT2-4b2fNZHN6nKzmCWJTZiRUWAVhGNIqXFOhqLrGSwOa9e3gS6OfnRdyBrcc-EXHOKA6VIBgQc93809oF-z8LZWaI8dzS5OcMYCNSUF-XQCZ8KOWPctUZKZSzhzKTi4rNPTnimUusFLNFdD1nuvgSC7ivhngS8On7fGXQ5MQZ9hSMUm9NZTRFBsOVS2A3FR1vcC0nYohNgEYsDDrCoKyGg8rVw2CpROYpLUdvKOO_1fd4vzD2iJjRYgV_0zbtcj-fibxiT4nc-Uf5Xi8-PvaZE4Psx5YbG1Jtn3fc0jSxk5kPvDXILoqzW6cpzykYhlMVKYJsezCBmGQ04GtgcjtssvRzF_6EqgyTcTVs8jDynEEYrZ4w4&u=https%3A%2F%2Fcabforum.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fpublic
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to