It doesn't look like this was ever resolved. Would anyone be opposed to a ballot that addressed this and was circulated before the F2F, just to get this squared away?
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also forwarding Erwann's reply. > DZ. > > > > Bonjour, > > The format of the extension needs to be defined as well. I guess a NULL > content will be sufficient for the purpose of a test certificate. > > Whence, adopting the RFC5912 notation, the test extension could be defined > as: > > id-cabforum OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 2 23 140 } > id-cabf-testcertificate OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-cabforum XX YY ZZ } -- > To be defined > > ext-cabf-testcertificate EXTENSION ::= { > SYNTAX NULL IDENTIFIED BY id-cabf-testcertificate > CRITICALITY { TRUE } > } > > Cordialement, > Erwann Abalea > > > > On 5/9/2016 3:24 μμ, Dimitris Zacharopoulos wrote: > > > Re-posting to the public list. > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Re: [cabfman] Assign Test Certificate CAB Forum OID > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 11:52:30 +0000 > From: Dean Coclin <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > To: Dimitris Zacharopoulos <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > CC: [email protected] <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > > Public list would be appropriate as I don't see anything confidential here? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 5, 2016, at 9:54 AM, Dimitris Zacharopoulos <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Ballot 169 > <https://cabforum.org/2016/08/05/ballot-169-revised-validation-requirements/>, > defines: > > *"Test Certificate:* A Certificate with a maximum validity period of 30 > days and which i) includes a critical extension with the specified Test > Certificate CABF OID, or ii) which chains to a root certificate not subject > to these Requirements. " > > This OID is not defined yet. Does this process go through a regular > ballot? Is it an issue for the management or the public list? > > > Best regards, > Dimitris. > > _______________________________________________ > Management mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/management > > > > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing > [email protected]https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > > > > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
