On 23/04/17 21:08, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > We always review the status of ballots.
I can see the value in making sure we keep track of ballots. Perhaps, though, the agenda for a teleconference might not be the best place? There are, as we know, various ballot phases: 1) Drafting period 2) Discussion period 3) Voting period 4) IPR review period It seems to me that having a standing agenda item for 2) and 3) makes most sense. Ballots in stage 1) could be added at the request of the lead drafter. Unless there is an Exclusion Notice, ballots in stage 4) are not very interesting (and their exit from IPR review is heralded by an email to the list). So perhaps it might make most sense to have a public web page somewhere where we keep track of which ballot is in which stage, but confine the agenda items to groups 2) and 3)? Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
