On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Peter Bowen via Public <[email protected]> wrote: > Kirk, > > The 190 draft I posted explicitly assumes this ballot 202 passes. It used > the BRs with these changes integrated as the “before” version and only > tracks further changes. This Ballot 202 adds clarification to a number of > places in the BRs that wildcards are allowed and gives us the basis to make > it explicit in validation methods. > > I do not think it is necessary or prudent to pull 202 back. > > Thanks, > Peter
I agree with Peter. _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
