Amazon votes YES.

> On Aug 24, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Kirk Hall via Public <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The voting period will then run from 22:00 UTC today through 22:00 UTC.
>  
> If you have comments, please post them now.
>  
> From: Public [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via Public
> Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 8:30 PM
> To: CABFPub <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Ballot 210: Misc. Changes to the Network and 
> Certificate System Security Requirements
>  
> The discussion period for this ballot is 12 days to give everyone ample time 
> to review it.  Voting will start at 2200 UTC on Thursday, August 24, 2017.
> 
> The Network Security Working Group recommends that the Forum make the 
> following minor revisions to the Network and Certificate System Security 
> Requirements.   (Other changes are being considered by the Working Group and 
> will be presented in due course.)
> 
> The following ballot is proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and 
> endorsed by Ben Wilson of DigiCert and Neil Dunbar of TrustCor.
> 
> --Motion Begins-- 
> 
> In the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements: 
> 
> ADD ETSI EN 319 411-1 to first sentence of the Scope and Applicability 
> section so that it reads "These Network and Certificate System Security 
> Requirements (Requirements) apply to all publicly trusted Certification 
> Authorities (CAs) and are adopted with the intent that all such CAs and 
> Delegated Third Parties be audited for conformity with these Requirements as 
> soon as they have been incorporated as mandatory requirements (if not already 
> mandatory requirements) in the root embedding program for any major Internet 
> browsing client and that they be incorporated into the WebTrust Service 
> Principles and Criteria for Certification Authorities, ETSI TS 101 456, ETSI 
> TS 102 042 and ETSI EN 319 411-1 including revisions and implementations 
> thereof, including any audit scheme that purports to determine conformity 
> therewith." 
> 
> REPLACE section 1.a. with "a. Segment Certificate Systems into networks based 
> on their functional or logical relationship, for example separate physical 
> networks or VLANs;"
> 
> REPLACE section 1.b. with "b. Apply equivalent security controls to all 
> systems co-located in the same network with a Certificate System;"
> 
> REPLACE "90 days" with "three (3) months" in section 2.g.ii. and 2.j so that 
> they read "ii. For accounts that are accessible from outside a Secure Zone or 
> High Security Zone, require that passwords have at least eight (8) 
> characters, be changed at least every three (3) months, use a combination of 
> at least numeric and alphabetic characters, that are not a dictionary word or 
> on a list of previously disclosed human-generated passwords, and not be one 
> of the user's previous four (4) passwords; and implement account lockout for 
> failed access attempts in accordance with subsection k; OR" 
> 
> AND 
> 
> "j. Review all system accounts at least every three (3) months and deactivate 
> any accounts that are no longer necessary for operations;"
> 
> REPLACE section 2.m. with "m. Enforce multi-factor OR multi-party 
> authentication for administrator access to Issuing Systems and Certificate 
> Management Systems;"
> 
> REPLACE section 2.o. with "o. Restrict remote administration or access to an 
> Issuing System, Certificate Management System, or Security Support System 
> except when: (i) the remote connection originates from a device owned or 
> controlled by the CA or Delegated Third Party, (ii) the remote connection is 
> through a temporary, non-persistent encrypted channel that is supported by 
> multi-factor authentication, and (iii) the remote connection is made to a 
> designated intermediary device (a) located within the CA’s network, (b) 
> secured in accordance with these Requirements, and (c) that mediates the 
> remote connection to the Issuing System."
> 
> REPLACE "every 30 days and" with "once a month to" in section 3.e. so that it 
> reads "e. Conduct a human review of application and system logs at least once 
> a month to validate the integrity of logging processes and ensure that 
> monitoring, logging, alerting, and log-integrity-verification functions are 
> operating properly (the CA or Delegated Third Party MAY use an in-house or 
> third-party audit log reduction and analysis tool); and"
> 
> REPLACE 4.a. with "a. Implement intrusion detection and prevention controls 
> under the control of CA or Delegated Third Party Trusted Roles to protect 
> Certificate Systems against common network and system threats;"
> 
> REPLACE 4.C. with "c. Undergo or perform a Vulnerability Scan (i) within one 
> (1) week of receiving a request from the CA/Browser Forum, (ii) after any 
> system or network changes that the CA determines are significant, and (iii) 
> at least every three (3) months, on public and private IP addresses 
> identified by the CA or Delegated Third Party as the CA’s or Delegated Third 
> Party’s Certificate Systems;"
> 
> REPLACE the definition of Security Support System in the Definitions with 
> "Security Support System: A system used to provide security support 
> functions, which MAY include authentication, network boundary control, audit 
> logging, audit log reduction and analysis, vulnerability scanning, and 
> intrusion detection (Host-based intrusion detection, Network-based intrusion 
> detection)."
> 
> Make other editorial changes as indicated at 
> https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/64/files 
> <https://github.com/cabforum/documents/pull/64/files> and in the attached 
> PDF. 
> 
> --Motion Ends—
> 
> The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot is as 
> follows:
> 
> BALLOT 210 - Final Maintenance Guideline 
> 
> Relevant Start times and End Times are 22:00 UTC
> 
> Discussion (7 to 14 days) Start: August 17, 2017     End: August 24, 2017
> 
> Vote for approval (7 days) Start: August 24, 2017    End:  August 31, 2017
> 
> If a vote of the Forum approves this ballot, the Chair will initiate a 30-day 
> IPR Review Period by sending out an IPR Review Notice.
> 
> After 30 days of announcing the IPR Review period by the Chair:
> 
> (a) If Exclusion Notice(s) are filed, this ballot approval is rescinded and a 
> PAG will be created; or (b) If no Exclusion Notices are filed, this ballot 
> becomes effective at end of the IPR Review Period.
> 
> From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final 
> Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or comparison 
> showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to 
> become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the full 
> set of guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made against the Final 
> Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need 
> not take into consideration other ballots that may be proposed subsequently, 
> except as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).
> 
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public 
> list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the 
> response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote 
> to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses 
> will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a 
> voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting 
> members are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/ 
> <https://cabforum.org/members/>
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast 
> by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by 
> members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is half of the 
> number of currently active Members, which is the average number of Member 
> organizations that have participated in the previous three Forum-wide 
> meetings (both teleconferences and face-to-face meetings). Under Bylaw 
> 2.2(g), at least the required quorum number must participate in the ballot 
> for the ballot to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or 
> abstaining.
> 
>  
> 
> <CABForum_Network_Security_Controls_Ballot_Draft_1.pdf>_______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public 
> <https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public>
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to