That's a good point. -Tim
> -----Original Message----- > From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gervase > Markham via Public > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 4:41 AM > To: Ryan Sleevi <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion > List <[email protected]>; Daymion T. Reynolds <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 218: Remove validation methods #1 and #5 > > On 10/01/18 23:49, Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote: > > "3.2.2.4.11 Validating Applicant as a Domain Contact > > Nit: for some time, 3.2.2.4.11 was "Any Other Method". I think we should not > reuse numbers in this section, for clarity. So the motion should specify > 3.2.2.4.11 as "[Obsoleted]" and have this one as 3.2.2.4.12. > > Gerv > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
