I hold my hands up and say I made a mistake, a mistake which I never
intended to cause harm. I deeply apologise to everyone on this list and to
the chair person for this misdemeanour.
I studied the Bylaws carefully when joining this forums last year to make
sure mistakes like this would never occur but regrettably this has happen
and it will be forever edged in my memory. I am prepared to face the
consequences.

James Burton

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Tim Hollebeek <[email protected]>
wrote:

> It's in our Bylaws:
>
> "As you know, this meeting includes companies that compete against one
> another. This meeting is intended to discuss technical standards related to
> the provision of existing and new types of digital certificates without
> restricting competition in developing and marketing such certificates. This
> meeting is not intended to share competitively-sensitive information among
> competitors, and therefore all participants agree not to discuss or
> exchange information related to:
>
> (a) Pricing policies, pricing formulas, prices or other terms of sale;
>
> (b) Costs, cost structures, profit margins,
>
> (c) Pending or planned service offerings,
>
> (d) Customers, business, or marketing plans; or
>
> (e) The allocation of customers, territories, or products in any way.”
>
> -Tim
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gervase
> > Markham via Public
> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 7:49 AM
> > To: James Burton <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum Public
> > Discussion List <[email protected]>; Matthias Merkel
> > <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Restrict certificate lifetime to domain
> registration period
> > (if certificate expiry date is greater than domain registration)
> >
> > On 12/01/18 12:54, James Burton via Public wrote:
> > > CAs could introduce a monthly certificate pricing with a minimal start
> > > term of 3 months and you only pay for the months you need.
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> > I can't immediately find a copy of the CAB Forum's antitrust statement
> > (perhaps this could be placed on our wiki?) but members agree not to
> discuss
> > prices, costs, cost structures, terms of sale etc. You place members in
> a difficult
> > position by suggesting ideas for new product offerings, price structures
> etc.
> >
> > Gerv
> > _______________________________________________
> > Public mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to