On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 26/01/18 16:22, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > > It's very important to note here - until the Chair has performed their > > duty, the Balloted documents are Draft Guidelines - and are not Final > > Guidelines or Final Maintenance Guidelines. > > Well, section 2.4(h) is carefully and intentionally worded such that the > Chair reports the "automatic" approval of the vote, rather than enabling > it. So that section is not an issue. This was discussed at the time we > redrafted this section, with the possibility of a chair not fulfilling > their duties being the exact concern which motivated this wording. > > However you are right that if the Review Periods were not validly > started, then they cannot have validly ended, and it seems the Review > Periods require the full text to be made available in order to be > validly initiated :-( > > > Let us now look to the Baseline Requirements [4]. As of time of this > > e-mail, the Website lists the "Current Version" as BR 1.5.1, adopted in > > Ballot 197. It lists versions 1.5.2 [5], 1.5.3 [6], and 1.5.4 [7] as > > pending IPR review, the results of Ballots 190 [8], 214 [9], and 215 > > [10] respectively. > > But I don't think this mislabelling has a bylaw-legal effect in itself. > This mislabeling does have an issue with respect to 2.2 of the Baseline Requirements, and CAs obligations therein.
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
