Dear Ben,
I just found Rufus is not a member. So what about discussion in Policy
reviewing WG to propose a ballot to solve the issue. Besides, I suggest to
confirm from Jeff or Don of CPA and ETSI, which definition is better:
Qualified Auditor: An independent public accounting firm that meets the
auditing qualification requirements as defined in Section 8.3 of the Baseline
Requirements
or
Qualified Auditor: A natural person or Legal Entity that meets the auditing
qualification requirements as defined in Section 8.3 of the Baseline
Requirements
Are there any case a natural person to conduct WebTrust for CA audit or
ETSI audit now? or An independent public accounting firm or Legal Entity is
better.
I am sorry that now the teleconference time of Policy reviewing WG is at
1:00 AM to 2:00 in Taipei. Because it is sleeping time that I can't join. But
I can join the discussion in CP WG List or Public List.
Sincerely Yours,
Li-Chun
Deputy Senior Engineer CISSP, CISA, CISM, PMP
Chunghwa Telecom
Taiwan
-----Original message-----
From:realsky(CHT)<[email protected]>
To:Barry
Kilborn<[email protected]>,public<[email protected]>,questions<[email protected]>
Cc:realsky<[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 22:41:32
Subject: Re: [cabfquest] Wrong reference in BRGs, chapter 8.4
Dear Rufus,
Besides, In writing BR assessment, I found there is another wrong
reference in the Section 1.6 of BR. The defitinon of "Qualified Auditor" is
read as Qualified Auditor : A natural person or Legal Entity that meets the
requirements of Section 8.3. It should be "Qualified Auditor : A natural
person or Legal Entity that meets the requirements of Section 8.2." I think
the wrong reference is from the conversion of BR V1.2.5 or earlier version to
RFC 3647 verison of BR. (Version 1.3.0/ Version 1.2.5 :Qualified Auditor: A
natural person or Legal Entity that meets the requirements of Section 8.3
(Auditor Qualifications).) . Please see attached file or
https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/
If you read EVGL, then the defition of Qualified Auditor is correct.
Qualified Auditor: An independent public accounting firm that meets the
auditing qualification requirements specified in Section 17.6 of these
Guidelines.
And you will see section 17.6 as
17.6. Auditor Qualification
A Qualified Auditor (as defined in Section 8.2 of the Baseline Requirements)
MUST perform the CA’s audit.
If you propose these amendment, I will endorse the ballot.
Sincerely Yours,
Li-Chun Chen
Deputy Senior Engineer
CISSP, CISA, CISM, PMP
Chunghwa Telecom
Taiwan
-----Original message-----
From:Buschart, Rufus<[email protected]>
To:[email protected]<[email protected]>
Cc:Barry Kilborn<[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:05:01
Subject: [外部郵件] [cabfquest] Wrong reference in BRGs, chapter 8.4
Dear CA/B forum members!
It appear there is a wrong reference in the BRGs, chapter 8.4 “Topics covered
by assessment”. This chapter includes the statement “The audit MUST be
conducted by a Qualified Auditor, as specified in Section 8.3.”. This should
most probably read “as specified in Section 8.2” which describes
“Identity/qualifications of assessor”. Section 8.3 is empty.
I would propose, this should be changed in one of the upcoming ballots. I would
post this directly to the mailing list, but as not being a member, I’m
prohibited from posting.
Best regards
Rufus
Siemens AG
Information Technology
Human Resources
PKI / Trustcenter
GS IT HR 7 4
Hugo-Junkers-Str. 9
90411 Nnberg, Deutschland
Tel.: +49 1522 2894134
mailto:[email protected]
www.siemens.com/ingenuityforlife
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jim Hagemann Snabe;
Vorstand: Joe Kaeser, Vorsitzender; Roland Busch, Lisa Davis, Klaus Helmrich,
Janina Kugel, Cedrik Neike, Michael Sen, Ralf P. Thomas; Sitz der Gesellschaft:
Berlin und Mchen, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB
12300, Mchen, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322
_______________________________________________
Questions mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
本信件可能包含中華電信股份有限公司機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿蒐集、處理或利用本信件內容,並請銷毀此信件.
如為指定收件者,應確實保護郵件中本公司之營業機密及個人資料,不得任意傳佈或揭露,並應自行確認本郵件之附檔與超連結之安全性,以共同善盡資訊安全與個資保護責任.
Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains
confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your
system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and
all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the
improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email
nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the
intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information
contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or
distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also,
please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to
ensure the information security and to protect personal information.
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
