On 9/2/2018 3:53 πμ, Kirk Hall wrote: > > Dimitris – I already DID include the deadline in BR Sec. 1.2.2 for > the copy that will go on the website – see attached, at numbered page > 3 of the attached pdf. I don’t believe the information in this table > has ever been part of the underlying Ballot, has it? I always thought > it was included after the Ballot, and is a “non-substantive” part of > the BRs meant to be helpful. So I don’t think it has to be added to a > cleanup ballot. >
Good to know, thanks. > On Wednesday (yesterday) I sent you, Ben, and Jos the “final” pdfs to > go on our website showing the results of Ballots 217 and 218 – please > upload those copies, and not any earlier copies. > I think Jos already uploaded those. We are also trying to update the information on https://cabforum.org/ballots/. Dimitris. > *From:*Dimitris Zacharopoulos [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, February 8, 2018 1:51 AM > *To:* Kirk Hall <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum > Public Discussion List <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Review Notice – Ballot 218 > > > > Kirk, > > We forgot to include the deadline of August 1st 2018 in section 1.2.2 > (Relevant Dates) for the deprecation of methods #1 and #5. It is an > uncontroversial change but unfortunately, as previously discussed, we > don't have a process for "editorial" changes. > > > Dimitris. > > > On 7/2/2018 8:35 μμ, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: > > *NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD – BALLOT 218* > > * * > > This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the > CA/Browser Forum’s Intellectual Property Rights Policy (v1.2). > This Review Period is for Final Maintenance Guidelines (30 day > Review Period). A complete draft of the Draft Guideline that is > the subject of this Review Notice is provided with this Notice. > > > > Date Review Notice Sent: February 7, 2018 > > > > Ballot for Review: Ballot 218 > - Remove validation methods #1 and #5 > > > > Draft Guideline Sent with Notice: CA-Browser Forum BR > 1.5.6 > > > > Start of Review Period: February 7, > 2018 at 22:00 UTC > > > > End of Review Period: March 9, 2018 > at 22:00 UTC > > > > > > * * > > > > *IPR Policy Section 4.1 - Review of Draft Specifications*. Prior > to the approval of a CAB Forum Draft Guideline as a CAB Forum > Final Guideline or Final Maintenance Guideline there shall be a > review period during which Participants may exclude certain > Essential Claims from CAB Forum RF Licenses. The CAB Forum Chair > shall initiate the Review Period by distributing to each CAB Forum > Participant a notice of review period and a complete draft of the > Draft Guideline that is the subject of such notice (“Review > Notice”). Each Participant on behalf of itself and its Affiliates > shall have sixty (60) days following the date of the receipt of > such Review Notice (“Review Period”) to review such Draft > Guideline and consider any licensing obligations with respect to > any Essential Claims that may be encompassed by such Draft > Guideline. The approval of a CAB Forum Final Maintenance Guideline > shall follow the same process except that the Review Period shall > be thirty (30) days. > > / / > > *Section 4.2 - Excluding Patents and/or Patent Applications From > Royalty Free Licensing Obligations During Review Period. *Except > for Essential Claims encompassed by a Participant’s Contributions > that are actually incorporated into a Final Guideline or Final > Maintenance Guideline approved in accordance with the CAB Forum > Guideline approval process, Participants may within the Review > Period exclude Essential Claims from the CAB Forum RF License. In > such case, Participant shall be permitted to either make an > election, (i) not to grant a license or (ii) to provide a license > with all of the requirements of Section 5.1 with the exception of > subsection 5.1 f. > > *Bylaws Section 2.4 - Requirements for Draft Guideline Ballots **** > > (e) If a Draft Guideline Ballot passes the Initial Vote, the > Chair shall initiate, no later than the 3rd business day after the > announcement of the Initial Vote results, the Review Period of 30 > or 60 days, as applicable and as described in Section 4.1 of the > IPR Policy. The Chair will initiate the Review Period by sending > the Review Notice to both the Member Mail List and the Public Mail > List. The Review Notice will clearly specify the open and close > dates and times (with time zone) of the Review Period. If the > Chair does not initiate the Review Period within 5 business days > after the announcement of the Initial Vote results, the Vice Chair > may initiate the Review Period, using the same process as the > Chair would have been required to use. > > > > (f) The Review Period will continue to the end of the 30- or > 60-day period, as applicable, regardless of the number of > Exclusion Notices filed pursuant to the IPR Policy during such > period, if any. No later than 3 business days after the > conclusion of the applicable Review Period, the Chair will > distribute any Exclusion Notices submitted in accordance with > Section 4.2 of the IPR Policy via the Public Mail List; provided, > however, that the Chair may distribute such Exclusion Notices > earlier.*** > > * > * > > * * > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Public mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public > > >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
