[redirecting discussion to cabfpub]

> On 22 Oct 2018, at 6:45 pm, Ryan Sleevi via Questions 
> <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thus if you want a certificate for a single hostname, the SAN must be <= 64 
> characters. If you want to have a certificate for a SAN > 64 characters, you 
> need to encode an additional SAN (that is <= 64 characters), or you need to 
> use OV/EV. Ballot 208 would have fixed that.

I think you misunderstand the purpose of ballot 208.  If you don’t want to use 
OV or EV, and you can’t fit any of the SANs in the commonName, you can just not 
provide a commonName; it’s optional!  But, the claimed reason for ballot 208 is 
that there is some software out there which can't support empty subjectName and 
also supported only specific subjectName fields and that some people wanted to 
use this software without validating any part of the certificate except for the 
hostname.  Oh, and they didn’t want to use countryName nor serialNumber nor 
[several other alternatives omitted]...

Now, there are a bunch of alternatives to work around the various 
problems/bugs/whatevers, but the overall principle is:

- If your software has a lot of bugs and problems and missing features,
- And you're pretty picky, you must have DV and you won't rename your host and 
so on,
- Then eventually you paint yourself into a corner and nothing works.

I’m not sure anything can really save people from that.

So, my answer to the original question (is there even a question there?) is:


Thank you for your question.  The commonName field in a certificate subjectName 
is optional.  If all the host names in the certificate are too long to fit in 
the commonName, it must be omitted.  The host names will be placed in the 
dNSName part of the subjectAlternativeName field.  All SSL clients should use 
the subjectAlternativeName field to match the host so it should not matter that 
the commonName field is not present.

Under some circumstances, this may lead to a completely empty subjectName, 
which may cause difficulties with some software.  If such problems are 
encountered, and the software cannot be upgraded, it is suggested to add 
validated information to the subjectName field, such as countryName and/or 
organizationName, producing an OV certificate.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to