On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 08:46 +1000, Ruediger Landmann wrote: > On 06/11/2010 07:36 AM, Jaromir Hradilek wrote: > > Actually, I find this is a valuable semantic distinction for me as a > user as well. Because you can perform some actions on multiple languages > at a time, and some actions on only one language at a time, having to > type the correct option helps me keep these separate in my mind. > > If the --lang and --langs options were to be mashed together, we'd > really need an error message for the actions that can only be performed > on one language at a time that says something like "You can only package > one language at a time." > > Then of course people might wonder why we have an option called "langs" > that only allows you to perform an action on a single language. > > Maybe we should just leave it as it is. >
I agree, the first time i used "publican package" i tried to specify multiple langs with "langs=" but it failed. If the commands were mashed together, what i tried to do would still fail, as i can only specify one lang when building a package. allowing "langs=" to work will only confuse further. my 2 cents: keep the distinction between langs= and lang=. cheers, ryanlerch _______________________________________________ publican-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican
