But this circles back to my original question: does that mean no more translation for publican? And does that have any effect on translation for Fedora?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Fearn" <[email protected]> To: "Jared Smith" <[email protected]> Cc: "Publican discussions" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:39:01 PM Subject: Re: [publican-list] [Fwd: Re: r1722 - in trunk/publican-fedora: . .tx] On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 20:35 -0500, Jared Smith wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Jeff Fearn <[email protected]> wrote: > > In addition, even if they did host it against our will, none of it would > > be committed in to the Publican SVN repo. I'd move project hosting if > > this was not enforceable on fedora hosted. > > On a technical note, Transifex no longer pushes translations into > revision control, so it's completely up to developers/packagers to > decide whether or not (or when) to pull translated strings into their > software. Just one of the many changes between 0.7 and 1.0. No, but it poorly enough designed that it needs configuration files in repos it only pulls from. At this point we most certainly will not be accepting content from transifex.net, nor will we be using or recommending their service; and we will take great umbrage should they use our name or content to advertising their service. Cheers, Jeff. _______________________________________________ publican-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican
_______________________________________________ publican-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican
