Actually, and I know I'll probably take heat on this, but I'd be careful about redistributing content for which you don't have permission. There may be a reason why a feed owner does not want to use fat pings, whether the PubSubHubbub community finds it valid or not. In such a case, redistributing the feed might be considered a copyright infringement.
Now everyone can pile on me. ; ) On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Matthew Terenzio <[email protected]>wrote: > Impressive idea. I had figured I would have both a cloud and a hub but I > had not thought of crossing the streams. > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Brett Slatkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Nice. > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Julien Genestoux > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey, > > I hope I am not the only one feeling quite annoyed by the fact that we > have > > 2 "competing" open and standard protocols for the same purpose. If we > want > > to make real-time web something "real", we need to ease adoption of the > > technologies. At superfeedr, we just implemented the "subscriber" part of > > the Rsscloud, so that you don't have too : you will receive fat pings > from > > our hub : http://blog.superfeedr.com/PubSubHubbub/api/rsscloud/RSSCloud/ > > Let me know what you think! > > Julien > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Julien Genestoux, > > > > http://twitter.com/julien51 > > http://superfeedr.com > > > > +1 (415) 254 7340 > > +33 (0)9 70 44 76 29 > > > > >
