On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Andreas Kloeckner
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:46:27 -0600, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Well, I rather think it should.  First, this is harder to implement,
>> as the padding is just added recursively.  But second, the ambiguity
>> exists even at nested levels.
>>
>> If you don't like the way that the nested plusses look, I somewhat
>> agree, which is why I suggested that better symbology may be needed.
>>
>> Perhaps a vertical bar would look better:
>>
>> alist: [1, [2, 3]]
>> | 0: 1
>> | 1: [2, 3]
>> | | 0: 2
>> | | 1: 3
>
> Good idea. I like the vertical bars better. And forget about my ellipses
> comment. They're there. :)
>
> Andreas
>

Good, because that's what I ended up implementing.  See the pull request.

Aaron Meurer

_______________________________________________
Pudb mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pudb

Reply via email to