Apologies, I thought I was up to date, but I wasn't. Thanks very much for a great debugger!
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Andreas Kloeckner <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:32:53 -0400, Thomas Ballinger < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Apologies if I'm missing something or if this is frequently discussed - > > Can pudb be configured to use IPython 0.11 as an interactive shell > session, > > and would a patch to the effect likely be accepted? > > The commit > > > https://github.com/inducer/pudb/commit/d7cb2237f33325775584ab7cd39a3d6f6a31b237 > > claims to have added IPy 0.11 support to PuDB. If it falls short > somehow, I'd certainly accept a patch. > > Andreas >
_______________________________________________ Pudb mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pudb
