Hi Andreas, Thanks for your suggestion. I was already thinking about MIT and now it is.
Surely I'm open to incorporate this into pudb. I don't know how easy is to add some code to the pudb main loop, but it would completely vanish the need for the fork. -- msbrogli On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Andreas Kloeckner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marcelo, > > Marcelo Salhab Brogliato <[email protected]> writes: > > I don't know if a remote pudb project already exists, but I couldn't find > > it and I developed it a few hours ago. It worked very well in my Ubuntu > > Server 12.04 and I could access a pudb running inside a wsgi process. > > > > I still need to improve the README.md, create a setup.py, add it to pip, > > and add a licence to the code. > > > > By the way, what licence do you recommend? > > > > Any suggestion or pull request is welcome :) > > > > URL: https://github.com/msbrogli/rpudb > > > > -- msbrogli > > This is way cool! Thanks for writing it. License-wise, I like MIT--no > nonsense, no hidden agenda, no problems with corporate adoption. > > Btw, would you be open to incorporating this into pudb itself, say as > pudb.remote(.telnet?) (and/or set_trace_telnet and/or pu.rdb)? I think > I'd like that, but it's obviously up to you to like or dislike that > idea. > > Andreas >
_______________________________________________ Pudb mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pudb
