Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
Marc Rintsch wrote:
...
This one is critical.
It should be clarified, thus the templates can be corrected.
It affects kid, too.
kid is an XML templating tool so I expect it to produce XML with the
XML tag. Why break/cripple a valid XML document just because
Dreamweaver can't cope with it!?
Personally I've broken/crippled it to be able to design visually.
It's Dreamweaver that needs to be fixed here. IMHO.
I don't think so.
with a possibility of 99,9%, kid or pudge does something wrong.
pudge problem: the DOCTYPE tag is missing within the templates.
But I don't know what.
What defines a valid XML document?
is there any requirement to the filename extension?
pudge/kid templates are xhtml documents, thus they must contain the DOCTYPE:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#strict
.
--
http://lazaridis.com
_______________________________________________
Pudge mailing list
[email protected]
http://lesscode.org/mailman/listinfo/pudge