----- Original Message ----- > Would this have any effect on katello-agent for i386 arch clients?
The spec file[0] for katello-agent says that it depends on the following: Requires: gofer >= 2.5 Requires: python-gofer-proton >= 2.5 Requires: python-pulp-agent-lib >= 2.6 Requires: pulp-rpm-handlers >= 2.6 It looks like all of the above packages are noarch[1]. So theoretically you should still be able to use them on i386. Is my understanding correct here? [0] https://github.com/Katello/katello-agent/blob/KATELLO-2.3/katello-agent.spec#L14-L17 [1] https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/stable/2/fedora-24/i386/ - Dennis > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Thank you for following up. +1 to dropping i386 support because**. > > However, I think we should adjust the statement to be that Pulp only > > supports X86_64 at this time until we can develop a plan to bring in more > > architectures. One outcome of that is that i386 would be dropped. If there > > is no one opposed, making 2 tickets on it would be a good next step. One > > ticket to issue the statement via blog post and pulp-list, and another to > > update the build machinery to stop publishing i386. > > > > **: (a) we provide an incomplete set of i386 packages today so it doesn't > > actually work well, (b) we never QE on i386, and (c) I don't think anyone > > is using them, but I have no evidence for that > > > > -Brian > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> It's been almost a week and I have not heard from anyone on this topic. > >> Does that mean we all agree that Pulp should drop support for i386? > >> > >> -Dennis > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > As I was adding Fedora 25 to Koji, I noticed that our Fedora 24 > >> packages were > >> > not being built for i386. Even though most of the packages in the Pulp > >> repo > >> > are 'noarch', the pymongo related packages need to be compiled > >> specifically > >> > for i386. With having said that, I don't think we should support i386 > >> > architecture. We should make a formal announcement about this. What are > >> your > >> > thoughts? > >> > > >> > -Dennis > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Pulp-dev mailing list > >> > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pulp-dev mailing list > >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pulp-dev mailing list > > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > > > > > > > -- > Og Maciel > > Manager Quality Engineering > Red Hat, Inc. > irc: omaciel > _______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
