Team, I am fine with revisiting storage as some point but disagree that #2950 should be *high* priority (higher than most other tasks) and should not aligned with sprint 26. As noted in redmine, Our FileStorage implementation conforms to the django storage interface, is simple and tested. The django provided FileSystemStorage has concerning code quality and is completely undocumented. To safely subclass it will require inspecting the code line-by-line to ensure predictable behavior when overriding any of it's methods. As you all know, reliable storage is a critical part of Pulp.
As I said, it's a fine idea to revisit this. But, looking at the other tasks aligned to sprint 26 (and, all the work left to do for the MVP), this is not higher priority. -jeff https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2950
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
