+1 to "Release Updates" because it doesn't make an artificial distinction between work done by Red Hat employees and work done by the community.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: > During the sprint demos there are two sections which regularly (if not > always) present redundant content: the State of Pulp update, and the > Community Update. We need to combine or redefine these parts of our demos > to not be redundant or compete for content to present in each section. > Today the content was 100% redundant to the point where I entirely skipped > the community update. > > Please send ideas or comments. Here are two options I can think of: > > Have the State of Pulp be renamed to 'Release Updates' and have that > section talk about releases and any notable issues associated with them. > This is the option I recommend. > > Only have a community update and have all content (release updates, > community items, etc) all be delivered through that. I believe this is how > most projects do it, but I would prefer the option above personally. > > -Brian > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
