Recently many of these setup.py files were deleted so now there is only: common/setup.py <------ going away anyway with https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3066 platform/setup.py plugins/setup.py
I think it's good to have the folder use the python namespace names. If we did that it would be renaming 'platform' to 'pulpcore' with `git mv platform pulpcore`. I made an issue for this here [0] if that is what we want to do. [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3089 On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Austin Macdonald <aus...@redhat.com> wrote: > We recently made the decision to namespace Pulp as "pulpcore" [0], but > this has made our app location a little awkward: > `pulp/platform/pulpcore/app` > > To kick off the conversation, I think the best place to start is a map of > all of the setup.py files: > > bindings/setup.py > client_admin/setup.py > client_consumer/setup.py > client_lib/setup.py > common/setup.py > devel/setup.py > oid_validation/setup.py > platform/setup.py > plugins/setup.py > repoauth/setup.py > server/setup.py > streamer/setup.py > > > To me, it makes sense that pulpcore should move up a level, so the app > would live in `pulp/pulpcore/app` and the setup py would live in > `pulp/pulpcore/setup.py` > > > [0]: https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/2017-May/msg00030.html > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
