+1

David

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> We had some discussion about this PUP in a separate thread[0]. We have
>> now reached consensus on the wording of the PUP to open it up to voting.
>>
>> To refresh everyone’s memory, voting is outlined in PUP-1:
>>
>> https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#voting
>>
>> And here’s the PUP in question:
>>
>> https://github.com/dkliban/pups/blob/pup4/pup-0004.md
>>
>> Please respond to this thread with your vote or any comments/questions.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [0] https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/2017-November/msg00110.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to