+1 to both of those proposals (3.0 and 3.1) On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Daniel Alley <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Dana Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I like this idea for tracking purposes so that things do not fall by the >> wayside and for organization of future aims. >> >> --Dana >> >> Dana Walker >> >> Associate Software Engineer >> >> Red Hat >> >> <https://www.redhat.com> >> <https://red.ht/sig> >> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:04 PM, David Davis <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> We’ve been removing the Pulp 3 MVP tag from pulpcore issues in redmine >>> that we’re not going to complete for the Beta next week but some of these >>> issues we may want for the 3.0 GA. >>> >>> I’d like to propose we create a Pulp 3.0 milestone in redmine for the >>> Pulp project and start adding issues to it. I was also thinking we could >>> perhaps create a Pulp 3.1 milestone as well. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> David >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
