A Pulp Update Proposal (PUP) pull request has been opened by the go-to-lawyer for the Pulp community, Richard Fontana. The PUP is PUP5 [0]. I don't want to paraphrase it here, so please read it [0] if you are interested to understand what it does.
I am proposing a period of questions/discussion via the list/PR and then a call for a vote according to the process. All questions are welcome, please ask. # Timeline Today - May 18th mailing list and PR discussion May 18th - formally call for a vote which would end 12 calendar days from then May 30th May 30th - Merge or reject # FAQs Is this relicensing Pulp? No. It's still GPLv2. This adopts a procedural enforment approach within the existing license. See @rfontana's response here: https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/9#issuecomment-384523020 Do all prior contributors need to sign off on this change? No, because it's not a relicensing. Does this affect core, plugins, or both? This PR is only scoped to affect the GPLv2 codebases maintained by the core team. Plugins make their own decisions without PUPs. Initially this would be pulp/pulp, and as other GPLv2 repositories are maintained by the core team, it would apply to this in the future as well. [0]: https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/9/files Thanks, Brian
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev