+1 to that. It's also blocking this PR's merge: https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1134
How do we remove F26 from the testing matrix? On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Dennis Kliban <[email protected]> wrote: > We should remove F26 from the testing matrix. This will leave us with F27 > and EL7 until we start building F28 packages. > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Milan Kovacik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> It seems to me the F26 CI is still broken: https://paste.fedoraproject.or >> g/paste/RVrMq9GoBbiFfbqHVm03mA https://pulpadmin.fedorapeople >> .org/jenkins/jobs/unittest-pulp_rpm-pr/builds/1155/node-type=f26-np.txt >> But do we need F26? It's been unmaintained IIRC for about a month already. >> >> -- >> milan >> >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Milan Kovacik <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> David, Patrick >>> >>> thanks for handling this! >>> >>> -- >>> milan >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:10 PM, David Davis <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> @milan, I thought you were gone for the day so I went ahead and opened >>>> a PR to package libsolv: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/47 >>>> <https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/47/commits> >>>> >>>> After it’s merged, I think RHEL should be good and hopefully your PR >>>> will pass as well. >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:35 PM Milan Kovacik <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks for the feedback guys! >>>>> >>>>> @David, what in particular needs doing to carry the libsolv in Pulp >>>>> repos? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> milan >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:52 PM, David Davis <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I agree we should carry the dependency until it’s released. The RHEL7 >>>>>> breakage is blocking QE currently so let’s revert the change[0] while >>>>>> @milan and I can work on getting a PR open to pulp-packaging to get the >>>>>> dependency into our repos. >>>>>> >>>>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/46 >>>>>> >>>>>> David >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:14 PM Patrick Creech <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 18:33 +0200, Milan Kovacik wrote: >>>>>>> > Folks, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > We've merged a package dependency requirement update[1] to make it >>>>>>> possible for the rich-dependencies work to be mergeable[2]. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > This has broken the EL7 builds >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, often times we have needs to carry new/updated dependencies that >>>>>>> aren't in an EL7 repo proper, and also not in the EPEL repos for >>>>>>> maintaining our EL7 support. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I do not think it'll be tenable to have EL7 support broken for any >>>>>>> significant period of time. Perhaps some discussions need to happen to >>>>>>> have an updated libsolv carried in pulp's repos for some time >>>>>>> untill a suitable version lands in a dependent repo. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Fedora 27&28 (stable) isn't affected. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Cheers, >>>>>>> > milan >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/45 >>>>>>> > [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1122 >>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> > Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>> > [email protected] >>>>>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev____________ >>>>>>> ___________________________________ >>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
