I'm confused by the "co" part of co-ownership. The Release team and the 2 members of that team are the only admins on this git project.. So there are no other "co" owners from the git teams perspective. Sorry if that's a dumb question.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Dana Walker <dawal...@redhat.com> wrote: > +1 > > This seems like a good move. > > Dana Walker > > Associate Software Engineer > > Red Hat > > <https://www.redhat.com> > <https://red.ht/sig> > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:58 PM, David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> I’ve talked to the release engineering team and they’d like to co-own the >> pulp-packaging project with us—meaning that they’ll review and sign off on >> our PRs. To do this, we can leverage the CODEOWNERS feature of Github[0] >> and I’ve opened the following PR: >> >> https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/49 >> >> <https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/49>Feedback welcome. I’ll >> wait until July 20th before proceeding. >> >> [0] https://help.github.com/articles/about-codeowners/ >> >> David >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
