On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Austin Macdonald <amacd...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure how to phrase this, but maybe something like "For a plugin to > be officially recognized by the Pulp community*, it must adopt this code of > conduct in its entirety, though it is their prerogative to extend it." > > * Official recognition is not official endorsement, but does include some > perks: > > 1. ability to track plugin issues on the Pulp redmine > 2. plugin source may live in the Pulp org on github > 3. Plugin will be listed on the Plugin table > > ^ This could be a separate PUP revision, if preferred. > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Dana Walker <dawal...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> A PR [0] is up with a proposed update to PUP-4: Code of Conduct [1]. >> >> The proposal changes the details of where the Code of Conduct is to be >> displayed. >> >> Please review and provide any comments, suggestions, and +/- 1's to the >> proposed changes by Sunday August 5. >> >> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/12 >> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0004.md >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Dana >> >> Dana Walker >> >> Associate Software Engineer >> >> Red Hat >> >> <https://www.redhat.com> >> <https://red.ht/sig> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
