Doing some research on code owners, I found[0] that I was wrong in that code owners have to have the commit bit:
*The people you choose as code owners must have write permissions for the repository.* I think this makes the code owners feature less useful to us. More importantly though, it means that we need to have a way for people to obtain the commit bit before they can become code owners. I’d propose that we table this discussion for now and instead focus on the process for obtaining the commit bit. @ipanova is working on a new draft of the commit bit PUP. [0] https://help.github.com/articles/about-codeowners/ David On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:58 PM Bryan Kearney <bkear...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 08/14/2018 11:00 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: > > hard unless the SME (and/or commit bit ownership) status is tied > > formally to review quality and rate. > > > I can see nagging the owners, but doing reviews of other parts of code > you dont know is a great way to (1) Learn it and (2) help the project. > > -- bk > > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
