Cookiecutter certainly looks very thorough, an active community, BSD license. I'm fairly unfamiliar with our existing plugin_template for Pulp. I suspect we would gain hours by not having to maintain as much for the template ourselves since our repo is fairly active. Is there anything we would lose through this approach?
--Dana Dana Walker Associate Software Engineer Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> <https://red.ht/sig> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: > A plugin writer suggested we do this, and I agree with them: > > https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4082 > > Please comment on if this is a good idea or not. > > Thanks! > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
