I've heard zero need for a or desire for Pulp 3 to be distributed other than PyPI. I've got no issues with closing an issue now and should things change in the future we can resurrect or create a new story if needed.
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 9:40 AM Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> wrote: > Please send feedback by Dec 7th. > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 7:49 AM Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> The plan about 12-24 months ago was to distribute Pulp3 with Pulp itself >> on a machine hosted in the osci.io community environment. We have this >> ticket tracking that work [0] (still at NEW). >> >> I commented [1] that I think our distribution plans now involve mainly >> PyPI releases, and we probably won't self-host our release infrastructure. >> Is that what others think? >> >> If we aren't self-hosting with Pulp, can we close this ticket [0], clean >> up the infra wiki [2], and ask OSCI to deprovision their machine? >> >> [0]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2325 >> [1]: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/2325#note-32 >> [2]: >> https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Infrastructure_&_Hosting#Distribute-Pulp-with-Pulp >> >> Thanks! >> Brian >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
