I feel like this is more accurate and comprehensive, but the initial summary is less readable. I could go either way. Others?
--Dana Dana Walker Associate Software Engineer Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> <https://red.ht/sig> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:24 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > Currently in our Pulp 3 release notes[0], we link to a query of PRs with > the 3.0 tag merged in a certain timeframe. I feel like this is prone to > user errors as in cases where we might forget to add the 3.0 label to a PR > or get the timeframe slightly wrong because of timezones. I was thinking > instead we could maybe link to the list of commits between tags. Here’s an > example: > > https://github.com/pulp/pulp/compare/pulpcore-3.0.0b15...pulpcore-3.0.0b16 > > If you click on any of these commits, there is a link to the PR by the > branch name so I feel like there’s no loss of information. > > Thoughts? > > [0] > https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/release-notes/pulpcore/3.0.x.html > > David > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
