On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 3:15 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Neal, > > I completely agree with the points you brought up and would love to see Pulp > 3 shipped in Fedora. The only thing I am hesitant about is the timing. Fedora > 30 is shipping in May, correct? We’re approaching an RC for Pulp’s core but > none of the plugins are really ready. I think releasing Pulp for Fedora 31 in > the fall might be more feasible but maybe we can re-evaluate in March. >
If things are in a usable state, there's no reason not to start the packaging work and go through the package review process[1]. That lets us sort out issues early and get them addressed in time for integration into the distribution. Failing that, there could be a COPR[2] for it if it doesn't fully make it. [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process [2]: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/ > Also, I’d love to talk more about integrating Pulp into's Fedora > infrastructure. I joined the Pulp team a couple years ago and have been > constantly wondering why Fedora is not using Pulp to manage and distribute > its RPMs. Maybe at some point we can give you a demo of Pulp 3 and figure out > how we can help fill Fedora’s needs. > I know that previously Pulp was considered for at least hosting the container images[3]. I'm not sure what happened there. It'd be a good idea to introduce yourself to releng[4] and infrastructure[5] folks and propose the idea. [3]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service [4]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ [5]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastruct...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
