+pulp-list On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:14 PM Tatiana Tereshchenko <ttere...@redhat.com> wrote:
> RPM plugin team discussed this question recently and we are leaning > towards a conclusion that by default Pulp is expected to publish a repo > with a directory structure of a remote repository. > > E.g. At the moment if no base_path is configured for a distribution, those > two repositories [0][1] (same content, different layout) result in a repo > with the same flat structure, all packages go into the root directory. Is > there an expectation that Pulp would generate two repositories with the > directory structure as in the original remote repo? > > 1. RPM plugin users, please, speak out, do you need/expect/want a > directory structure to be the same as in a remote repo you sync from? > > 2. It would be good to know if there is such a need for any other plugin > than RPM. It will help to answer the questions: Should we handle this in > pulpcore? or in every plugin since plugins might have different needs for a > default layout? > > Thank you, > Tanya > > [0] https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/fixtures/rpm-unsigned/ > [1] https://repos.fedorapeople.org/pulp/pulp/fixtures/rpm-alt-layout/ >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
