If I read the solution as hyphens vs underscores as implemented in ansible-pulp3 today then yes, it's still very confusing which is which.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019, 12:25 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > I agree with rchan and am thus leaning towards option 2. > > Just to be clear though, we renamed pulp 3’s services recently to avoid > conflict[0] with pulp 2. However, it sounds like this solution isn’t good > enough as it’s hard for users to identify which set of services go with > which version of pulp? > > [0] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4187 > > David > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:55 AM Robin Chan <rc...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> See comment below on option 2. >> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:31 AM Eric Helms <ehe...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Howdy, >>> >>> In some migration of Pulp 2 to Pulp 3 cases, both will need to be ran >>> side-by-side on the same box. Given that pulp workers and pulp resource >>> manager are the same concept in both, this leads to their systemd resources >>> being named the same (or in today's case so slightly different enough you >>> can't tell them apart). >>> >>> I'd like to propose a change to the service names to facilitate this >>> situation. >>> >>> >>> Option 1: Include Pulp version in Pulp 3 services >>> >>> Example: pulp3-resource-manager >>> >>> Pro: Explicit naming and understanding of new services. >>> >>> Con: This locks services names to Pulp version, which will be odd with >>> semantic versioning if 4 or 5 comes along. >>> >>> >>> Option 2: Re-name Pulp 2 services to pulp2- >>> >>> Example: pulp2-resource-manager >>> >>> Pro: Explicitly identifies pulp2 services, easy to retro-fit by users >>> onto their setups or through RPM releases. >>> >>> Con: Requires users to have upgraded to at least a particular Pulp2 >>> version to migrate to Pulp 3 (this may be required anyway). >>> >> [rchan] My expectation is that we will levy this requirement on >> upgrades/migrations anyway, so I don't think this con applies for this >> suggestion. >> >> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
