+1 Dana Walker
She / Her / Hers Software Engineer, Pulp Project Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> dawal...@redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 1:18 PM Grant Gainey <ggai...@redhat.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:52 PM Kersom <ker...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:33 PM Brian Bouterse <bbout...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:13 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:50 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Absolutely! This applies to Pulp 2 only. >>>>> >>>>> Our Pulp 3 development environment already gives you the option to >>>>> pick between different Fedora versions, CentOS, CentOS + FIPS, Debian, >>>>> etc. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:44 AM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019, 11:40 AM Daniel Alley <dal...@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Proposal: The pulp/devel repository will install a CentOS 7 base >>>>>>> box instead of a Fedora 28 one >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rationale: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * CentOS / RHEL is what our users are using. Using a different >>>>>>> platform can result in different behavior in the development >>>>>>> environment vs >>>>>>> what users see -- this happened to me recently and wasted a couple of >>>>>>> hours >>>>>>> on both the Dev and QE sides >>>>>>> * Fedora 28 is EOL and no longer receiving updates >>>>>>> * Pulp 2 the custom dev installation script (pulp-dev.py) is broken >>>>>>> on Fedora 29+ and I deemed it probably not worth the time or effort to >>>>>>> fix >>>>>>> * The RPM plugin is also broken on Fedora 29+ -- legacy "createrepo" >>>>>>> was obsoleted entirely and as far as I can tell you can't import some of >>>>>>> the libraries we are using from that package anymore >>>>>>> * There's little point in tracking fast-moving Fedora changes at >>>>>>> this point in Pulp 2's lifecycle anyways >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a branch that already works on CentOS. It's a few patches >>>>>>> behind but would take about 5 minutes to get cleaned up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any objections? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This sounds good to me. I hope we are still developing and testing on >>>>>> Fedora for Pulp 3, though? >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > > > -- > Grant Gainey > Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
