Hi all, in the ansible-pulp role (that is meant to install pulp) we use a role to install the postgresql db-server from galaxy named ansible-role-postgres. Sadly the upstream version of this role is missing fedora30 support, and the PR for this has not been merged for a long time. This leads to ansible-pulp using a clone of this role, which is hosted on github in a personal namespace and is missing debian10 support respectively. This sounds to me like a kind of short term workaround, but it is in place for almost half a year now.
I see several ways to move this forward: 1)Leave it as is, wait for upstream. pros: nothing to do (now) cons: no good debian support 2)Use upstream role and add fedora30 config like debian10 config [0] pros: no need to maintain a clone of the role cons: ugly workaround 3)Use upstream, and drop fedora30 support for now pros: no need to maintain a clone of the role cons: seems quite obvious? 4)Maintain a clone of the role in the pulp namespace with a team of committers pros: most flexibility, fedora30 & debian10 support cons: extra maintainance work (The order is random, and the numbers are only for future references. I do not want to express a personal preference this way.) Matthias [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulplift/pull/45
pgphXMIUNCunm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev