I feel differently especially when considering that most other Pulp plugins are at > 1.0. Can you explain why you think pulp_file shouldn't be at 1.0?
David On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:57 AM Brian Bouterse <bmbou...@redhat.com> wrote: > I've seen software live in the < 1.0 area for a long time and graduate > when it's in broad, production use. That's a difficult thing to assess > accurately, but to me, pulp_file hasn't reached that point. > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 2:20 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> With the next release of pulp_file, I'd propose we bump the version to >> 1.0. The pulp_file plugin has reached a level of maturity and stability >> that I think it could be considered production-ready. I've opened a PR to >> bump the version to 1.0.0: >> >> https://github.com/pulp/pulp_file/pull/380 >> >> Feedback welcome. I'll set a deadline of April 27, 2020. >> >> David >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
