We have recently started a new repository calles pulp-oci-images that should emit according to its name OCI compatible images with pulp installed. In the first go, this includes the single-container promoted though this blog post [0]. Soon to be added is the base container image that shall speed up our CI [1]. In the future, i envision a similar single-container solution based on centos instead of fedora, as well as ci base images based on centos having python3.6 installed. Does anyone think, we even need different ci-images for pulp release branches?
The big question now is: How are we going to name and tag those images? The one from [0] is called "pulp/pulp-fedora31:latest". We could go with that and add names like: - "pulp/pulp-centos8:3.2" installation of core version 3.2 with all compatible plugins on centos8 - "pulp/pulp-ci-fedora32:latest" - "pulp/pulp-ci-centos8:latest" BTW, the ci-base images can be built by using the same Conteinerfile interrupted early. (with --target in a multistage build) What do you think? [0] https://pulpproject.org/2020/03/15/pulp-fedora31-single-container/ [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/blob/master/.travis/Containerfile.ci_base _______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
