I just saw the email subject. Total mislabel on my part :-O Demo! I meant survey. Luckily it is just the draft. https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5
Ar Aoine 24 Iúil 2020 ag 17:47, scríobh Robin Chan <rc...@redhat.com>: > > Robin Chan > > She/Her/Hers > > Satellite Software Engineering Manager - Pulp > > Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> > > IRC: rchan > > Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to > answer this email out of your office hours. > <https://www.redhat.com> > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:32 PM Melanie Corr <mc...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> Ar Déar 23 Iúil 2020 ag 17:35, scríobh David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com >> >: >> >>> Thanks for working on this. Responses inline below. >>> >>> David >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:55 AM Melanie Corr <mc...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I need your help in shaping the survey[0]. >>>> >>>> I copied over some questions from last year's survey and added what I >>>> thought might be interesting. Last year's survey contains a lot of >>>> "planning" questions for future upgrades to Pulp 3. Many things have >>>> changed since then, and I think you know best where we need to focus. >>>> >>>> I added conditions to the survey to try and separate the following: >>>> >>>> * Questions for Pulp 2 Users >>>> * Questions for Pulp 3 Users >>>> * Questions for people who are in-between their migration. This last >>>> category of user may exist only in my head. Let me know :) >>>> >>> >>>> Questions for you: >>>> >>>> Do you think streaming the survey into separate user groups like this >>>> is a good idea? >>>> >>> >>> Is it possible though to compare the results across surveys (like what >>> OS people are using)? >>> >> It's the same survey, with sections that redirect for Pulp 2 users or >> Pulp 3 users. >> I had to think about this. The answer was yes but with added work. >> To avoid extra processing of answers, I added the generic questions (OS, >> size, etc) to one section while keeping conditional Pulp 2 and Pulp 3 >> sections. >> If someone in the Pulp 2 section answers that they have installed Pulp 3, >> they also get redirected to the Pulp 3 section afterward so they can give >> their opinion on that :) >> Am happy to apply any feedback. >> > > Gotcha. Ok, that could be nice for the user - skip questions that aren't > relevant to them. > > >> >> > >>>> [0] >>>> https://forms.gle/aynaM4d4wX5Aterz5 >>>> >>> >> This link is live. Take a look :) >> >> I also applied Matthias's feedback and added timeline options for when >> users plan to upgrade to Pulp 2. >> There's a duplication of a question "Where are you located" in the first >> and last section. I deleted it but it is still there. If it doesn't go >> away, I'll create a new survey when we are happy with the questions. >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Melanie Corr, RHCE >>>> >>>> Community Manager >>>> >>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> >>>> >>>> Remote, Ireland >>>> >>>> mc...@redhat.com >>>> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr >>>> <https://www.redhat.com> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-dev mailing list >>>> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> Melanie Corr, RHCE >> >> Community Manager >> >> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> >> >> Remote, Ireland >> >> mc...@redhat.com >> M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr >> <https://www.redhat.com> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > -- Melanie Corr, RHCE Community Manager Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> Remote, Ireland mc...@redhat.com M: +353857774436 IM: mcorr <https://www.redhat.com>
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev