The repo has been archived https://github.com/pulp/pups .
-------- Regards, Ina Panova Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:20 PM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > > it has been a while ( a year +) we have not used PUPs in our project > development process change. > That's a sign of having something we do not benefit from and this only > creates additional confusion and unnecessary complications. > We will no longer use this process and we are not going to replace this > with any other formal process for now - all the suggestions are being > openly and inclusively brought up during the open floor or via pulp-dev > email list. This has been working for our project and community quite well. > > This is what is going to happen next unless I hear strong opinions against > proceeding further: > 1. We are going to archive this repo https://github.com/pulp/pups > 2. I have filed a documentation issue that will update docs to not mention > the PUP process https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7747. We will address that > during our next Docs Day. > > Github repo will be archived on November 2nd, please express all the > objections, if any, by then. > > Thank you! > > -------- > Regards, > > Ina Panova > Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc. > > "Do not go where the path may lead, > go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
