On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:34 AM Fabricio Aguiar <fagui...@redhat.com> wrote:
> ## March 31, 2021 > > * Github Actions > * good overall > * faster and more reliable so far than Travis > * easier to debug with tmate action > * downsides > * virtualization > * not possible to re-run individual jobs > * https://github.com/actions/runner/issues/432 > * people need write permission to re-run CI > * https://github.com/actions/runner/issues/841 > * workaround: `git commit --amend`, no changes, force push > * Release automation https://pulp.plan.io/issues/8093 > * Availability > * Mike after operator? > * David has ~1 FTE > * Fabricio? Not sure. Maybe 0.5 FTE. > * Dkliban? > * First goal? https://pulp.plan.io/issues/7868 > * [david] to write up design > * Regular CI/CD meeting? > * Every other Wednesday 9:30-9:55am (15:30 EST) > * [david] to schedule > * Convert CI/CD code to ansible playbook? > * Benefits: idempotence, easier to run locally > * *Big* rewrite > I'm a little worried about this even besides its effort. One of my worries if we switch to Ansible is that not everyone knows it. If folks have to learn a new technology that's another barrier to usage. I've seen this happen with the installer already to some extent. > > https://hackmd.io/@pulp/cicd > > Best regards, > Fabricio Aguiar > Software Engineer, Pulp Project > Red Hat Brazil - Latam <https://www.redhat.com/> > +55 22 999000595 > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
